Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Mr. I. v. Maine School Administrative District No. 55

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
480 F.3d 1 (2007)


Facts

LI (plaintiff) was a sixth-grade student at the Maine School Administrative District Number 55 (the district) (defendant), attending Cornish Elementary School. LI was generally a good student and had been receiving high honors. However, in the fifth and sixth grade, LI’s grades dropped to honors, and she had difficulties with her peer relationships. LI began experiencing sadness and anxiety. LI had wounds on her arms that appeared to be self-inflicted. During her sixth-grade year, LI attempted suicide by overdosing on prescription medications. LI was then diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome, which is a developmental disability on the autism spectrum that is associated with significant misperceptions of otherwise-routine elements of daily life. The medical specialists treating LI recommended that she receive direct teaching of social skills. LI’s parents requested an individualized education plan (IEP) for LI from the district. The pupil-evaluation team (PET) considered the request. The PET accepted the medical diagnosis but determined that LI was not eligible for an IEP, because her condition did not significantly affect her academic performance. LI appealed this decision to a hearing officer, who affirmed the decision. LI then filed a lawsuit in district court to review the decision. The district court determined that LI did qualify as a student with a disability. The district appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.