Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

Mrs. M. v. Bridgeport Board of Education

96 F. Supp. 2d 124 (2000)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mrs. M. v. Bridgeport Board of Education

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
96 F. Supp. 2d 124 (2000)

CS

Facts

Mrs. M. (plaintiff) was the mother of a disabled child, I., who was entitled to special-education services from the Bridgeport Board of Education (the district) (defendant) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Mrs. M. claimed that the district had incorrectly identified I. as mentally disabled in violation of the IDEA. Mrs. M. exhausted her rights to administratively challenge the district’s determinations, unsuccessfully. Mrs. M. then brought a suit on I.’s behalf in federal district court and also sought to bring the same complaint as a class action on behalf of other minority children in the district, alleging that the district had adopted a policy of misidentifying this group of children as mentally disabled. The district moved to dismiss the claims related to the other children on the grounds that those children had failed to exhaust administrative remedies and therefore were not entitled under the IDEA to bring a claim in federal court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Droney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law

Key Terms