Muckle v. State

307 Ga. App. 634, 705 S.E.2d 721 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Muckle v. State

Georgia Court of Appeals
307 Ga. App. 634, 705 S.E.2d 721 (2011)

Facts

Virginia Muckle (defendant) and her boyfriend were involved in a volatile, on-and-off relationship for several years. One argument between the parties at Muckle’s apartment escalated to the throwing of objects and finally the fatal stabbing of the boyfriend by Muckle. Police arrested Muckle, who initially said that three male assailants had broken into her apartment and killed the victim. In the ensuing trial, Muckle admitted that this story was a fabrication. Muckle also admitted to hiding the knife so that police would be unable to find it. Nevertheless, Muckle claimed that the stabbing was done in self-defense after the victim entered her apartment without permission and physically attacked her. Muckle also claimed the defense of habitation. For its part, the state of Georgia (plaintiff) relied on the testimony of a witness who lived in the adjacent apartment. The witness testified that the victim had not spoken or behaved in a threatening manner prior to the stabbing. According to the witness’s testimony, the wounded victim staggered onto the sidewalk, where Muckle kicked him in the rib cage and prevented the witness from helping him. Other evidence presented by the state included a prior inconsistent statement from Muckle to the effect that she had voluntarily allowed the victim into her apartment. Also, a detective testified that no blood or evidence of an altercation was found where Muckle claimed the stabbing had occurred. Muckle was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and aggravated assault and sentenced to 15 years in prison. She moved for a directed verdict of acquittal and later for a new trial, asserting that the state had failed to disprove her defenses beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to the voluntary-manslaughter count. The motions were denied. Muckle appealed. The Georgia Court of Appeals granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Barnes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership