Muhammad Ali v. State Athletic Commission
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
316 F.Supp. 1246 (1970)
Between 1961 and 1967, Muhammad Ali, (plaintiff), also known as Cassius Clay, was the World Heavyweight Champion in boxing. In April 1967, the New York State Athletic Commission (Commission) (defendant) suspended Ali’s license to box in New York because of his refusal to join the U.S. Army. In June of that year, Ali was convicted in U.S. District Court of the federal felony of refusing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces, and was sentenced to five years in prison. Ali’s conviction was affirmed and the U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court for a determination of whether the conviction was marred by evidence obtained illegally. In September 1976, Ali’s New York boxing license automatically expired pursuant to state law which provided that all such licenses are good for only one year. Thereafter, Ali applied to renew his license. The Commission refused, citing Ali’s federal criminal conviction as the rational for the rejection. However, Dooley, the Chairman of the Commission (defendant) advised Ali in a letter that should his conviction be overturned, Ali could reapply for a license. After the district court reaffirmed Ali’s conviction, Ali brought suit against the Commission claiming that his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated, giving rise to a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismissed Ali’s complaint except for Ali’s broad Equal Protection violation claim. The court granted Ali leave to amend his complaint to specifically assert a violation of his equal protection rights. Ali sought a declaratory judgment and injunction restraining the Commission from denying him a license to box in New York.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.