Muhammad v. Commonwealth
Virginia Supreme Court
611 S.E.2d 537 (2005)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
John Allen Muhammad (defendant) and Lee Boyd Malvo jointly participated in fatally shooting 11 people over a 47-day period. Malvo was the "triggerman" in each shooting, firing at the victim from a small hole in the specially modified trunk of Muhammad's car. Muhammad supplied Malvo's rifle, drove Malvo to the site of each shooting, spotted each victim, and directed Malvo to shoot at the right moment. The Commonwealth of Virginia (plaintiff) prosecuted Muhammad for first-degree murder. Under Virginia law, a convicted murderer was subject to the same penalties regardless of whether he was found guilty of first-degree or second-degree murder. However, only a convicted first-degree murderer could be sentenced to death. The jury found Muhammad guilty of first-degree murder and the judge sentenced him to death. Muhammad appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lemmons, J.)
Dissent (Agee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.