Mukaddam v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
111 F. Supp. 2d 457 (2000)
- Written by Catherine Cotovsky, JD
Facts
Rajaa Al Mukaddam (plaintiff) sued her employer, the Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations (the mission) (defendant) for wrongful termination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 following two years of alleged harassment and gender discrimination. The mission moved to dismiss Mukaddam’s complaint, arguing that the mission could not be subject to Mukaddam’s legal challenge on account of the mission’s sovereign immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 (the Vienna Convention) that conferred foreign states with the freedom to appoint staff members to their missions. The mission argued that the freedom to hire and fire its own staff provided the mission with absolute immunity from challenges to its staffing activities. In considering the motion to dismiss, the court first determined that Mukaddam’s employment fell within the commercial-activity exception of the FSIA and thus that the mission was not entitled to sovereign immunity. The court then considered the mission’s assertion of diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaplan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.