Mukoda v. The Boeing Co.
Tokyo District Court
Hanrei Times (No. 604) 138 (1986)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Mukoda Kuniko (Mukoda), a passenger on an airplane operated by Far Eastern Air Transport (FEAT), died when the airplane crashed in Taiwan. The Boeing Company (Boeing) (defendant), an American company, manufactured the airplane. United Airlines, Inc. (United) (defendant), an American company with a business office in Japan, had sold the airplane to FEAT. Boeing and United were initially sued in the United States by families of other victims. The United States court dismissed that lawsuit on the ground that Taiwan was the more convenient forum because most of the important items of evidence and witnesses were located in Taiwan. The United States court also relied on expert testimony that a Taiwanese court had jurisdiction over the matter. Boeing and United waived statute-of-limitations and jurisdiction defenses in Taiwan. Mukoda’s successors (plaintiffs) sued Boeing and United in Japan, claiming that the airplane crash had been caused by Boeing’s manufacturing and design defects and by United’s failure to correct or warn FEAT about the defects. Boeing and United denied liability. Boeing and United motioned to dismiss the action, arguing that the Japanese court should decline to exercise jurisdiction on forum non conveniens grounds.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Yazaki, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.