Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Mullendore Theatres, Inc. v. Growth Realty Investors Co.

691 P.2d 970 (1984)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Mullendore Theatres, Inc. v. Growth Realty Investors Co.

Washington Court of Appeals

691 P.2d 970 (1984)

Facts

In 1969, Conner Theatres Corporation (Conner) entered a 10-year lease that required Connor to pay a $22,500 security deposit to the landlord of the property. The lease provided that: (1) the landlord could keep the security deposit as damages if Conner defaulted in the performance of the lease; (2) if Conner did not default, the landlord would return the security deposit to Conner when the lease expired in 1979; and (3) all covenants in the lease ran with the land. Conner assigned the lease to Mullendore Theatres, Inc. (Mullendore) (plaintiff) in 1974. The deposit was reduced to $6,000 at the time of the assignment. Prior to the assignment, the landlord transferred the property to North Pacific World Trade Center, Ltd. (North Pacific). In 1975, North Pacific defaulted on a note and deed of trust. Growth Realty Investors Co. (GRIC) (defendant) acquired the property and sold it to the City of Tacoma (city). GRIC agreed to indemnify the city for any liability it might have for the $6,000 deposit. Mullendore negotiated a new lease with the city in 1980 and agreed to release the city from any claims Mullendore had against it. However, Mullendore reserved its claims against any other potentially liable party and sued GRIC for the return of the security deposit. The trial court found that the 1969 lease’s covenant to refund the deposit ran with the land and that GRIC was bound through the indemnification clause in its agreement with the city. On appeal, GRIC claimed that: (1) the covenant to return the deposit did not run with the land, and (2) Mullendore’s release of the city extinguished any obligation that GRIC might have assumed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Worswick, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership