Municipal Building Authority v. Lowder

711 P.2d 273 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Municipal Building Authority v. Lowder

Utah Supreme Court
711 P.2d 273 (1985)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

The Iron County Board of Commissioners (commissioners) planned to build a new jail pursuant to the Utah Municipal Building Authority Act (UMBA). The commissioners proposed using general bonds to finance the construction. Article XIV, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution required these bonds to be approved by voters. In December 1981, the bond proposal was defeated, and the commissioners devised a plan to construct the jail without voter approval. Article XIV, Section 3 only required voter approval when the indebtedness belonged to a county or a subdivision of a county. The commissioners created the Iron County Building Authority (ICBA), a quasi-municipal governmental entity designed not to be a subdivision of Iron County (county). Under the new plan, the ICBA would secure a construction site and issue revenue bonds with a term of 20 years to finance the construction and pledge its interest in the project site and the facility as security. The county would lease the new jail facility from the ICBA on a year-to-year basis for 20 years. After 20 years passed and the bonds were paid in full, the ICBA would transfer title of the new jail to the county. Additionally, the agreement stipulated that if the ICBA prematurely defaulted on the bonds, the bond holders could foreclose on the new jail and ICBA’s interest in the site, but they could not pursue the county or taxpayers in recourse. The district court upheld the UMBA and the commissioner’s decision to finance the construction of a new jail through the ICBA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zimmerman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership