Munoz v. Kaiser Steel Corp.

203 Cal. Rptr. 345 (1984)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Munoz v. Kaiser Steel Corp.

California Court of Appeal
203 Cal. Rptr. 345 (1984)

Facts

Anthony Munoz (plaintiff) was unemployed and living in Texas. He interviewed at Kaiser Steel Corporation (Kaiser) (defendant) in California. Kaiser tentatively hired Munoz, pending approval of Kaiser’s management. Munoz’s interviewer told him that he would be trained for at least three years. Munoz took this to mean that he was guaranteed employment for at least three years. Kaiser management approved the hiring, and Munoz moved to California and began working for Kaiser. Kaiser sold his house in Texas and bought a house in California. About six months after Munoz began work, Kaiser laid him off. Munoz sued Kaiser for breach of an alleged oral employment contract, under which Kaiser promised Munoz at least three years of employment. The trial court granted Kaiser summary judgment based on the statute of frauds. Munoz appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 735,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 735,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership