Munroe v. Harriman
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
85 F.2d 493 (1936)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Joseph Harriman (defendant) defrauded Charles Munroe (plaintiff) to obtain a loan of corporate securities. Harriman pledged the loan to Harriman National Bank and Trust Company (bank) (defendant) as security for the bank’s cash loan to a shell corporation under Harriman’s control. Harriman, who was the bank’s president, completely dominated the bank’s directors (defendants) who, at Harriman’s direction, voted to accept the pledged securities and approve the cash loan. Munroe subsequently discovered Harriman’s fraud and sued Harriman, the by now-bankrupt bank, the bank’s receiver (defendant), and the bank’s directors to rescind the loan and recover the pledged securities. A federal district court entered judgment for Munroe. The bank appealed to the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Swan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.