Munstermann v. Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center

716 N.W.2d 73 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Munstermann v. Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center

Nebraska Supreme Court
716 N.W.2d 73 (2006)

KL

Facts

Marty Nuzum was treated by Dr. Hudson Hsieh (defendant), a psychiatrist at Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center (Alegent) (defendant), for depression and suicidal ideations. Nuzum was checked for, but did not exhibit, homicidal tendencies. One of Hsieh’s treatment notes stated that Nuzum reported having problems with his girlfriend and that Nuzum was thinking of hurting her. Five days after being discharged, Nuzum murdered his girlfriend, Jodi Sue Rowe, when she went to Nuzum’s apartment to get a set of car keys. The representative of Rowe’s estate, Carol Munstermann (plaintiff), sued Alegent and Hsieh for wrongful death. Munstermann argued that Alegent and Hsieh had failed to protect or warn Rowe of Nuzum’s threat. At trial, Hsieh testified that he believed Nuzum’s statement about hurting Rowe referred to emotional injury. Munstermann’s expert witness testified that, in his opinion, Nuzum’s statement likely referred to physical violence, but the witness could not speak to whether Hsieh believed Nuzum to be making a threat. Alegent and Hsieh filed a motion for a directed verdict, arguing that Munstermann failed to present sufficient evidence that Nuzum had communicated a serious threat giving rise to a duty to warn Rowe. The trial court denied the motion. The jury was unable to reach a verdict, and the trial court declared a mistrial. Alegent and Hsieh filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which the trial court denied. Alegent and Hsieh appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gerrard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership