Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. Woodham

208 So. 2d 56 (1968)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. Woodham

Mississippi Supreme Court
208 So. 2d 56 (1968)

JL

Facts

Maymie Woodham (plaintiff) obtained a judgment against Mr. and Mrs. T. C. Parks (defendants) in 1964. Parks owned and operated Parks Auto Sales, a vehicle dealership. Parks Auto Sales financed its inventory through floor planning, also known as trust-receipt financing. Parks Auto Sales entered into a secured transaction that involved pledging the vehicles on the lot as security for a loan from Murdock Acceptance Corporation. Each year, Parks Auto Sales would execute and record a statement saying that the vehicles were held in trust for the benefit of the lender and the sale of the vehicles would be for the sole purpose of repaying the loan. However, in 1965, Mr. Parks died. Mrs. Parks continued to operate the dealership and granted power-of-attorney to Murdock Acceptance to file the appropriate trust receipts. At least two trust statements were signed, but the statements were not recorded in the chancery clerk’s office. On December 14, 1965, Woodham obtained a writ of execution. The next day, at approximately 9 a.m., Murdock Acceptance recorded a financing statement. At approximately 11 a.m., the sheriff gave notice to Mrs. Parks that he was levying six vehicles pursuant to the writ of execution. Murdock Acceptance argued that the levy was invalid.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rodgers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership