Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Murdock v. City of Memphis

United States Supreme Court
87 U.S. 20 (1875)


Facts

Murdock (plaintiff) sued the City of Memphis (the city) (defendant) in Tennessee state court. The complaint alleged that Murdock’s ancestors sold land to the city in 1844 for construction of a United States naval depot. The deed contained a clause that conveyed the property back to the grantors if it was not used as a depot. The same year, the city sold the land to the United States by warranty deed, without conditions or mention of the depot. The United States then made improvements to the property for use as a naval depot. In 1854, by act of Congress, the United States transferred the property back to the City of Memphis for the use and benefit of the city. Murdock alleged that the property instead should have reverted back to the grantors under the condition in the original deed to the city. The trial court granted the city’s motion to dismiss the complaint, ruling that the city had perfect title to the property from the United States. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed, stating that the act of Congress in conveying the property to the city controlled the issue. The United States Supreme Court granted Murdock’s writ of error.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Bradley, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Clifford, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.