Murphey v. Mid-Century Insurance Company

2014 WL 2619073 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Murphey v. Mid-Century Insurance Company

United States District Court for the District of Kansas
2014 WL 2619073 (2014)

Facts

A vehicle driven by Beverly Murphey (plaintiff) was struck by a vehicle driven by Laura Wiggs (defendant). Kevin Lash, an adjuster for Mid-Century Insurance Company (Mid-Century) (defendant), was assigned to handle Murphey’s insurance claim. Lash communicated with Murphey’s attorney via email on several occasions to negotiate a settlement. Murphey’s attorney initially proposed an amount of over $366,000. Mid-Century’s lowest settlement offer was $116,000. In one email, Lash offered $221,000 to settle all claims. Murphey’s attorney accepted the $221,000 offer by email. Subsequently, Lash responded that the offer was a typographical error and that he had intended to offer $121,000. Murphey’s attorney and Lash exchanged further emails expressing their differing views as to whether a valid agreement was formed by Lash’s $221,000 offer. Murphey filed suit against Mid-Century and Wiggs in Kansas state court, seeking to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement and alleging breach of contract. Murphey sought a declaratory judgment that a binding and enforceable settlement agreement existed. The case was removed to federal district court. Mid-Century asserted a counterclaim for rescission and denied the presence of an enforceable agreement. Murphey moved for summary judgment as to her breach-of-contract claim and moved for a judgment on the pleadings as to Mid-Century’s rescission claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership