Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Murphy v. Islamic Republic of Iran

740 F. Supp. 2d 51 (2010)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Murphy v. Islamic Republic of Iran

United States District Court for the District of Columbia

740 F. Supp. 2d 51 (2010)

Facts

Following the 1982 invasion of Lebanon by Israel, the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) (defendant) helped fund the Shi’ite radical organization, Hezbollah. The government of Iran supported Hezbollah in its terrorist activities aimed at converting the government of Lebanon into an Islamic theocracy. In 1983, the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS) sent a message to the Iranian ambassador in Syria directing the ambassador to contact the leadership of Hezbollah and instruct the leadership to take action against the United States Marines. On October 23, 1983, a Hezbollah suicide bomber attacked the United States Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon. The Beirut bombing resulted in the deaths of 241 American military servicemen and injured many others. In Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 515 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2007), the court held Iran and MOIS responsible for the Beirut bombing. However, when Peterson was decided, the district court reached its decision under Section 1605(a)(7) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a provision that forbade punitive damages and that resulted in inconsistent results in subsequent cases. Congress amended Section 1605(a)(7), replacing it with Section 1605A, allowing for suits for terrorist actions and providing for punitive damages. Here, the injured servicemen and the families of the dead servicemen (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit under Section 1605A of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), seeking retroactive application of Section 1605A to their claims against Iran.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lamberth, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership