Murphy v. Smallridge
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
468 S.E.2d 167 (1996)
- Written by Patrick Busch, JD
Facts
In May 1990, the Murphys (plaintiffs) signed a one-year lease to rent a house from the Smallridges (defendants). After the term expired on June 1, 1991, the lease became a periodic tenancy. The Smallridges repeatedly dumped trash in the house’s yard. After multiple complaints to the Smallridges, the Murphys anonymously reported them to the state Department of Natural Resources. The Department investigated, and on September 26, 1991 informed the Smallridges that the dumping was illegal. The next day, the Smallridges informed the Murphys that the lease would be terminated, but then agreed to let them remain in exchange for a $150 increase in rent. The Murphys instead vacated the premises and filed suit for retaliatory eviction. The trial court dismissed their suit for failure to state a cause of action, holding that retaliatory eviction can only be raised as a defense by a tenant who remains on a property and is subject to an eviction action by the landlord. The Murphys appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cleckley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.