Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
Court of Appeals of New York
250 N.Y. 479, 166 N.E. 173 (1929)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Steeplechase Amusement Co. (Steeplechase) (defendant) owns and operates an amusement park at Coney Island, New York. One attraction is called “The Flopper.” It consists of a moving belt that causes passengers to be thrown backward or aside based on its jarring movements. The belt runs in a groove and has padded walls and padded flooring. Murphy (plaintiff) stepped on the belt and attempted to ride it. He was accompanied by his wife and other members of their party. The belt suddenly jerked and Murphy, his wife, and other members of the party fell down. Most were uninjured, but Murphy suffered a fractured kneecap. He brought suit against Steeplechase on the ground that “The Flopper” was dangerous to life and limb because of its violent jerking, stops, and starts. Additionally, Murphy alleged the belt was not properly equipped to prevent injury to its riders, and was operated at a fast and dangerous speed. Finally, Murphy alleged the belt did not contain a proper guardrail to prevent the falling of its riders. The trial court granted judgment for Murphy, and the appellate court affirmed. Steeplechase appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.