Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy
United States Supreme Court
2 Cranch 64, 6 U.S. 64 (1804)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Charming Betsy was an American ship that was sold to Jared Shattuck. Shattuck was born in the United States, but moved to St. Thomas, a Danish territory, when he was an infant. Shattuck lived in St. Thomas ever since, and took an oath of allegiance to the crown of Denmark. The Charming Betsy was captured from Shattuck by a French national. Murray, an American captain, recaptured the ship from the French and sold its cargo. Murray was acting pursuant to a law (the act) that prohibited any commerce between United States residents and those people under the protection of the United States, and the French. Murray believed that the French seizure of the ship from Shattuck was merely a cover, and that Shattuck actually sold the ship to the French in violation of the act. The consul of Denmark, which was a neutral country in the American-French conflict, claimed the ship and its cargo on the ground that Shattuck was a Danish subject. The trial court held that Murray’s seizure was illegal and ordered that the ship be returned to and damages paid to Shattuck. Murray, who was ordered to pay the damages, appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.