From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Murray v. United States
United States Supreme Court
487 U.S. 533 (1988)
Federal agents had Michael Murray (defendant) and some of his co-conspirators under surveillance. The agents observed two large vehicles enter into a warehouse and exit about 20 minutes later. When the vehicles exited the warehouse, police observed inside the warehouse two people and a tractor-trailer rig carrying a long, dark container. The police subsequently followed the two vehicles, and when the drivers were stopped, the police found the vehicles full of marijuana. After hearing about the marijuana in the vehicles, the agents remaining at the warehouse went inside, where they saw numerous burlap-wrapped bales. Without touching anything, the agents left the warehouse, keeping it under surveillance while a warrant was obtained. The warrant application did not mention the prior entry and contained no information that was gathered upon that first entry into the warehouse. Upon obtaining a warrant, the agents reentered the warehouse and seized the bales, which were found to contain marijuana. Murray moved to have the evidence in the warehouse suppressed, arguing that the warrant was invalid because the warrant application did not mention the prior entry. The district court denied the motion, and the appellate court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.