From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Murray v. UNMC Physicians
Nebraska Supreme Court
806 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 2011)
Mary Murray suffered from pulmonary arterial hypertension, a chronic medical condition in which the blood vessels in the lungs constrict causing heart failure. The condition could be treated using Flolan therapy, a medication administered by a pump that relaxed the blood vessels. However, the therapy cost approximately $100,000 per year and was required to be administered constantly. It was life threatening for the patient if treatment was interrupted, but extremely expensive to administer for the remainder of an individual’s life. Mary’s physician, Austin Thompson, M.D., had prepared to treat her with Flolan therapy pending results of several tests and insurance approval, but Mary died before treatment could begin. Mary’s husband, Robert (plaintiff), individually and as executor of Mary’s estate, filed suit against Nebraska Medical Center, the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, UNMC Physicians (UNMC), Dr. Thompson and others (defendants) claiming the defendants caused Mary’s death by negligently failing to administer the Flolan therapy. However, UNMC was the only defendant remaining at the time of trial. At trial, the parties disputed whether UNMC had breached the requisite standard of care. At the close of his case, Robert moved for a directed verdict on the standard of care. He argued that an insurance company cannot dictate what doctors may do. UNMC claimed that an ongoing financial source is something a physician must consider in determining a course of treatment for a patient. Robert’s motion was overruled. The jury found for UNMC. Robert filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial court granted. UNMC appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gerrard, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 540,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 540,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.