Musik-Vertrieb Membran GMBH v. GEMA

[1981] ECR 147, [1981] 2 CMLR 44, [1981] FSR 433, 12 IIC 526 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Musik-Vertrieb Membran GMBH v. GEMA

European Communities Court of Justice
[1981] ECR 147, [1981] 2 CMLR 44, [1981] FSR 433, 12 IIC 526 (1981)

SH

Facts

GEMA (defendant) was a German society that collected mechanical royalties from record companies on behalf of music publishers and songwriters. Musik-Vertrieb Membran GMBH (Musik) and K-Tel International Ltd. (K-Tel) (defendants) each imported records on which protected musical works were recorded from Member States of the European Communities into the German Federal Republic. The defendants had paid the appropriate royalties in respect of distribution in the Member State of manufacture, but GEMA claimed additional royalties were due to it (the difference between the royalties already paid and the German royalty rate) for the infringement of the exclusive right of the works of German owners to distribute copies of the work in the German Federal Republic. The question referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities was whether this levy of additional royalties was consistent with the Treaty Establishing the European Communities (EEC Treaty) provisions on the free movement of goods.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership