Musmeci v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets

332 F.3d 339 (2003)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Musmeci v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
332 F.3d 339 (2003)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Schwegmann Giant Super Market Partnership (partnership) (defendant) managed a chain of grocery stores primarily around New Orleans, Louisiana. The partnership included Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. (SGSM), G. G. Schwegmann Company, and John Schwegmann Jr. Trust Estate. SGSM owned a 70 percent interest in the partnership and was the managing partner. John Schwegmann (Mr. Schwegmann) was the chief executive officer of SGSM and made most daily operations decisions. Mr. Schwegmann created a voucher program for long-term retired partnership employees. Retirees received four $216 vouchers each month that could be exchanged for groceries in partnership stores. The partnership funded the vouchers through its general revenue. Each year, the partnership deducted the total face value of the vouchers as business expense on its tax returns under the retirement-plans category. The partnership also sent voucher recipients an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 1099-R form reflecting the value of the vouchers they received that year. The partnership took a financial downturn and cancelled the voucher program. Retirees enrolled in the voucher program, including John Musmeci, and current employees who met voucher eligibility (plaintiffs), filed a class-action lawsuit in federal district court against the partnership and Mr. Schwegmann, claiming that they were vested in a pension benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The district court ruled in favor of Musmeci and the employees, finding that the voucher program constituted a pension plan under ERISA. The partnership appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership