Musto v. Meyer
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
434 F. Supp. 32 (1977)
- Written by Matthew Celestin, JD
Facts
In 1968, David F. Musto (plaintiff) wrote an article (the article) about the history of cocaine use in Europe, which was published in a medical journal. In the article, Musto suggested that the fictional character of Sherlock Holmes used cocaine and was treated for his addiction by Sigmund Freud. In 1974, Nicholas Meyer and others (defendants) published a book (the book) and produced a film (the movie) based on the book, both of which portrayed a Sherlock Holmes adventure story in which Holmes was addicted to cocaine and was treated by Sigmund Freud. The article and the book had several elements that were similar; however, the objectives, plots, character details, and literary styles were different. Musto filed suit for copyright infringement, claiming that the book and movie copied Musto’s article and thus infringed his copyright. Meyer filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, denying that the book and movie were sufficiently similar to the article.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bonsal, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
