Mvududu v. Mvududu No and Others

1981 ZLR 397 (GD) (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mvududu v. Mvududu No and Others

Zimbabwe High Court
1981 ZLR 397 (GD) (1981)

Facts

Magaragada Mvududu and his wife, Rhoda Mvududu, had five sons, Mwashinga, Ngona, Enoch, Taylor, and Killion. Magaragada owned farm 227 in the Rowa Purchase area of Zimbabwe. Mwashinga and Ngona each also had farms in the Rowa Purchase area. Enoch, Taylor (plaintiff), and Killion did not have their own farms but built houses on farm 227. In 1951 Enoch had a son, John (defendant). In 1967 Magaragada began preparing for his death. Magaragada gathered his family together and announced that Mwashinga, as his eldest son, would be his heir, following African customary law, and Mwashinga would therefore become the head of the family, look after his parents, and receive his father’s property upon his father’s death to hold for the benefit of the family. At the time, a person could be the record owner of only one Rowa Purchase farm, so Mwashinga could not be the record owner of farm 227. Magaragada therefore planned to transfer farm 227 to Enoch as the record owner, with Mwashinga managing farm 227 on the family’s behalf. Before Magaragada could do so, he died. The district commissioner transferred farm 227 to Enoch, incorrectly certifying that Enoch was Magaragada’s heir at customary law. When Enoch died in 1977, John attempted to transfer farm 227 into his name. The family obtained an interdict restraining John from doing so pending a court proceeding. John, contradicting the testimony of all other family members, claimed that Magaragada named Enoch as his customary heir because Enoch had helped pay for and fence the farm. Mwashinga, incorrectly believing that the restriction on owning multiple Rowa Purchase farms still existed, proposed that Taylor, as the next son in line after Enoch, should become the record owner of farm 227. Ella Manyengawana, the sabuku of the local area, testified. A sabuku was the local expert on and arbiter of matters of African customary law. Manyengawana testified when a father inherits property from his own father, the property transfers to the eldest son, and when the eldest son dies, the property passes to the eldest son’s next brother, and so on down the line of brothers.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McNally, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership