Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.

252 F.3d 1306, 58 U.S.P.Q.2d 1891 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

252 F.3d 1306, 58 U.S.P.Q.2d 1891 (2001)

Facts

Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. (Mycogen) (plaintiff) owned three related United States patents: United States Patent No. 5,567,600 (the 600 patent), United States Patent No. 5,567,862 (the 862 patent), and United States Patent No. 5,380,831 (the 831 patent). The 600 and 862 patents were child patents of the 831 patent. All three patents had identical titles, nearly identical specifications, and disclosed similar claims. The 600 and 862 patents were the subject of an infringement suit between Mycogen and Monsanto Co. (defendant). In that case (Delaware I), the issues of claim construction and patent invalidity were fully litigated and were essential to the ultimate jury verdict of invalidity of the 600 and 862 patents. The jury found the patents invalid due to prior invention. This resolution included a finding that Monsanto was the first to reduce to practice the four-step invention of the 600 patent. On appeal, the claim construction and jury verdict were affirmed. Mycogen sued Monsanto in a separate action in federal court for infringement of the 831 patent, which claimed a two-step invention. The four steps of the 600 patent included the two steps of the 831 patent. The district court granted summary judgment of invalidity, relying in part on the conclusion that the doctrine of collateral estoppel required the district court to adopt Delaware I’s claim construction and its determination that Monsanto was first to reduce the four-step invention to practice. Mycogen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership