Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc.

592 F.3d 1201 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
592 F.3d 1201 (2010)

Facts

Dawn Myers (plaintiff) worked for Central Florida Investments, Inc. (CFI) (defendant). David Siegel (defendant), CFI’s sole shareholder and chief executive officer, subjected Myers to repeated sexual harassment and unwanted touching over a period of years. Myers reported the incidents to CFI’s human-resources department, to no avail. On two occasions during the year 2000, Siegel pinned Myers against the wall, made lewd comments, and touched her inappropriately. Myers testified that Siegel’s behavior humiliated her in front of other employees and drained her motivation to work. CFI suspended Myers in December 2000, a year in which she had earned $102,223.14. In 2001, CFI sued Myers for repayment of a loan. Myers counterclaimed for battery. The jury found that all of Siegel’s offensive touching had occurred after the May 21, 2000 statute of limitations for battery and awarded Myers $102,223.14 in compensatory damages. CFI and Siegel appealed, arguing that the damages award was excessive.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership