Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Myers v. Commonwealth

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
298 N.E.2d 819 (1973)


Facts

A Massachusetts statute outlines preliminary-hearing procedures. The statute provides that a court must examine the state prosecution’s witnesses in the defendant’s presence and that the defendant may present evidence and cross-examine state witnesses with help from counsel. A judge held a preliminary hearing to determine whether there was probable cause to support the prosecution of Kenneth Myers (defendant) on charges of rape and assault. At the preliminary hearing, the complaining witness testified on the state’s behalf but merely repeated the rape accusations against Myers. At the end of the direct examination, Myers’s counsel commenced a cross-examination. However, before the cross-examination was finished, the judge stated that there was already enough evidence to find probable cause. Myers’s counsel objected, wanting to complete the cross-examination and introduce further evidence on Myers’s behalf, including a medical report and psychiatric evaluation of the complaining witness. The judge repeated the finding of probable cause and ended the hearing. Myers petitioned to have the finding of probable cause vacated on the grounds that Myers’s statutory rights to confront his accuser and present evidence had been violated. The state argued that Myers did not have an absolute right to cross-examine state witnesses and present testimony, as the judge presiding over the preliminary hearing had the discretion to find probable cause even after listening only to the state prosecution’s witnesses.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tauro, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.