N.L.R.B. v. Florida Memorial College
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
820 F.2d 1182 (1987)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
In 1979 full-time faculty at Florida Memorial College (Florida Memorial) (defendant) voted to join a union comprising several groups of employees. The union was certified by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (plaintiff), but Florida Memorial refused to bargain with the union on the ground that full-time faculty were considered managerial or supervisory. Under the National Labor Relations Act (the act), such employees were excluded from coverage. The union filed an unfair-labor-practice charge with the NLRB, which sided with the union and ordered Florida Memorial to collectively bargain. The NLRB then sought enforcement of its order. At Florida Memorial, full-time faculty did not have an exclusive organization through which they could exercise authority or provide input. Instead, certain faculty were chosen by the vice president of the college to participate in standing committees, which also included administrators and students. Recommendations of these committees on matters of promotion and hiring could be ignored by the dean. Curriculum, graduation requirements, and enrollment at Florida Memorial were dictated by a college catalog, which faculty had no input into. New courses could be suggested, but they required approval by the academic dean. Florida Memorial had an open admissions process and did not offer tenure to faculty.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.