Nada v. Switzerland
European Court of Human Rights
2012-II Eur. Ct. H.R. 1691
Youssef Nada (plaintiff) was a resident of a small Italian town that was entirely surrounded by Swiss territory known as an enclave. In 2001, Nada was added to the United Nations (UN) Sanctions Committee’s List. Shortly thereafter, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1390 (Resolution), requiring UN member-nations to prohibit anyone named on the sanctions list from crossing the nations’ borders or travelling through the nations’ territories. Switzerland (defendant) implemented amendments to its Taliban Act in order to fulfill its new obligations under the Resolution. Consequently, Nada was barred for six years from travelling outside of the small enclave in which he lived. Although an investigation found no proof of Nada’s alleged terrorist connections, Nada was not removed from the sanctions list until 2009, despite his failing health. Nada filed a claim against Switzerland in the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that Switzerland’s prohibition on travel through its territory constituted a breach of Switzerland’s obligations under Articles 8 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to respect private and family life and to provide effective remedies for injury under the law.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.