Naftzger v. American Numismatic Society

49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 784 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Naftzger v. American Numismatic Society

California Court of Appeal
49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 784 (1996)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The American Numismatic Society (the museum) (plaintiff) operated a museum that had a collection of coins. The museum’s collection included over a thousand copper cents donated by George Clapp (the Clapp coins). At some point before 1970, a thief stole 129 of the Clapp coins and substituted inauthentic coins in their place. In December 1990, the museum discovered the theft when it received a report from a coin expert who had examined the museum’s collection of Clapp coins. Subsequently, the museum learned that Roy Naftzger (defendant) possessed some of the stolen coins. In February 1993, the museum notified Naftzger of the museum’s claim to the stolen coins and demanded their return. Naftzger refused. In March 1993, Naftzger filed an action for declaratory relief and to quiet title to his Clapp coins. In 1993, the museum filed a cross-complaint against Naftzger to recover the stolen coins and to quiet title. The trial court found that Naftzger was entitled to quiet title to the coins and entered judgment in favor of Naftzger. The museum appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ortega, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership