Nagata v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.

303 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (2004)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
N
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Nagata v. Quest Diagnostics Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
303 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (2004)

SC
Play video

Facts

On January 19, 1999, Nagata (plaintiff) took a urine test as requested by his employer, Garden Isle Telecommunications. Quest Diagnostics Inc. (defendant) tested the urine sample and found that it was inconsistent with human urine. Garden Isle fired Nagata as a result of the test. Thereafter, Nagata suffered from depression and substance abuse, and contemplated suicide. On January 10, 2001, Quest informed Garden Isle that it had used incorrect testing procedures between January 4, 1999, and February 2, 1999. Quest discovered the mistake in February 1999. The improper procedures could have resulted in erroneous results to Nagata’s test. On January 25, 2001, Garden Isle notified Nagata of Quest’s error and offered Nagata his job back. Nagata brought suit against Quest for intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the company’s intentional withholding of the testing error from Garden Isle and Nagata for almost two years. Quest filed a motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts