Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Association, Inc.
California Supreme Court
878 P.2d 1275 (1994)
- Written by Dennis Chong, JD
Facts
Nahrstedt (plaintiff) purchased a unit in the Lakeside Village Condominiums and moved in with her three cats. When the condominium association (association) (defendant) learned of the cats, it demanded their removal. Nahrstedt sued the association, arguing that the restriction was unreasonable as applied to her cats, which were kept indoors and not free to roam any common areas. The trial court sustained the association’s demurrer against the complaint, and Nahrstedt appealed. A divided appeals court held that Nahrstedt’s allegations that her cats remained indoors and did not bother her neighbors could, if proven, support a declaratory-judgment action. The association appealed to the California Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennard, J.)
Dissent (Arabian, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.