United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
869 F.2d 675 (1989)
In response to delays caused by a massive backlog of unadjudicated cases, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Social Security Administration (SSA), acting on behalf of Secretary of Health and Human Services Otis Bowen (Secretary) (defendant), instituted a number of reforms. The new policies were intended to increase the quality and efficiency of the administrative law judges (ALJs) responsible for processing the cases. Simon Nash (plaintiff), an ALJ in charge (ALJIC), complained about the new policies and was demoted to an ALJ. Nash filed suit against the Secretary and other government officials (defendants) in federal district court. Nash alleged that three specific aspects of the reforms interfered with the ALJs’ decisional independence under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.: (1) a peer-review program subjecting ALJ decisions to additional review, (2) monthly production goals requiring ALJs to decide a minimum number of cases each month, and (3) a quality-assurance program aimed at limiting the number of ALJ decisions reversing denials of benefits. Following a bench trial, the district court concluded that the challenged reforms did not improperly curtail the ALJs’ decisional independence. The district court dismissed Nash’s claims. Nash appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Altimari, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.