Nash v. Mulle
Supreme Court of Tennessee
846 S.W.2d 803 (1993)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Helen Nash (plaintiff) and Charles Mulle (defendant) had a child, Melissa. Mulle had no contact with Melissa and did not pay child support to Nash for Melissa’s care and maintenance. After a hearing to establish paternity, Mulle was declared Melissa’s father and ordered to pay $200 per month in child support. Six years later, Nash filed a motion to increase the support amount based on Mulle’s significantly increased income. At a hearing, there was evidence that Mulle’s income had risen from $30,000 to over $200,000. The court ordered Mulle to pay $3,092.62 per month, with $1,780.17 reserved for a trust fund established for Melissa’s college education. Mulle appealed. The court of appeals reversed and limited the child support award to $1,312 per month, or 21 percent of $6,250, the top monthly income to which the child-support guidelines explicitly applied. Additionally, the appellate court disallowed the trust fund award, finding that the award improperly extended the parental duty of support beyond the age of majority. The Tennessee Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Daughtrey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
