National Association of Convenience Stores v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
958 F. Supp. 2d 85 (2013)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Under the Durbin Amendment, the Federal Reserve Board (board) (defendant) was permitted to increase allowable interchange fees to reflect debit-card issuers’ incremental authorization, clearance, and settlement (ACS) costs. However, the Durbin Amendment forbade the board from considering nontransaction-specific issuer costs in determining allowable interchange fees. The Durbin Amendment did not expressly address whether the board could consider issuers’ transaction-specific costs that did not qualify as ACS costs. The board issued a rule increasing the allowable interchange fees. In doing so, the board considered transaction-specific, non-ACS costs. In addition, the board adopted a rule requiring that all debit cards be interoperable with at least two unaffiliated payment networks (nonexclusivity rule). A group of individual retailers that accepted debit cards for payment and merchant trade associations, including the National Association of Convenience Stores (collectively, merchants) (plaintiffs), sued the board, seeking vacatur of the two rules. The merchants asserted that (1) the board exceeded its authority under the Durbin Amendment by considering issuers’ transaction-specific, non-ACS costs and (2) the nonexclusivity rule contravened the Durbin Amendment because the statute required the board to mandate that all debit transactions, rather than just all debit cards, be capable of running over at least two unaffiliated networks.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Leon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.