National Association of Independent Insurers v. Texas Department of Insurance
Texas Supreme Court
925 S.W.2d 667 (1996)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
The Texas State Board of Insurance (the board) (defendant) adopted two administrative rules. The first rule, Rule 1000, prohibited insurance companies from refusing to sell certain types of insurance to prospective purchasers if the purchasers had had an insurance policy canceled by another insurer. The board stated that consideration of a previous cancellation was anticompetitive and resulted in the blacklisting of consumers from the insurance market. The second rule, Rule 1003, prohibited insurers from conditioning the sale of automobile insurance on the purchase of another policy. Rule 1003 also prohibited insurers from denying automobile insurance due to the number of vehicles owned by an applicant. The board stated that these practices were unfairly discriminatory and that prohibiting the practices would lead to greater availability and affordability of automobile insurance. The National Association of Independent Insurers (the insurers) (plaintiff) brought suit, contending that the rules violated the Texas Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The trial court held that the rules were valid, and the court of appeals affirmed. The insurers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cornyn, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Spector, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.