National Bank of Washington v. Equity Investors

506 P.2d 20, 81 Wash. 2d 886 (1973)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Bank of Washington v. Equity Investors

Washington Supreme Court
506 P.2d 20, 81 Wash. 2d 886 (1973)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Equity Investors (borrowers) (defendant) executed a deed of trust with National Bank of Washington (the Bank) (plaintiff) on May 9, 1969, to loan $1,850,000 for an apartment-construction project. The loan agreement stated that $1,750,000 of the funds would be dispersed to the borrowers and placed into a construction-loan account in the lending bank. The agreement stated that the funds would be dispersed to contractors if the architect agreed that the contractor’s work was sufficient and if the lender agreed that the work was completed in a good and workmanlike manner. The agreement also provided the lender with control to use the borrower’s funds to purchase work and materials to protect the property from weather or waste. The Bank had total discretion to fund additional advances. The Bank began advancing funds for the project, and Columbia Wood Products, Inc. (Columbia) delivered wood to the project beginning on May 26. Columbia’s wood was used to construct the buildings. By August 5, construction on the project had stopped, and the borrowers still owed Columbia $119,672. Columbia sued the borrowers. Although the trial court awarded Columbia a judgment for the amount they were owed, the court held that the Bank had a senior security interest because the original loan was executed before Columbia started delivering lumber. Columbia appealed, arguing that the Bank’s later advances were junior security interests because the advances were optional and therefore secured on the later date they were made.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hale, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership