From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
National Biscuit Company v. Stroud
Supreme Court of North Carolina
106 S.E.2d 692 (1959)
Stroud (defendant) and Freeman formed a general partnership to sell groceries. The partnership agreement did not limit either partner’s authority to conduct ordinary business on behalf of the partnership. Several months before the partnership was dissolved, Stroud told a National Biscuit Company (NBC) (plaintiff) official that he would not be personally liable for any bread sold to the partnership. Freeman subsequently ordered more bread on behalf of the partnership, and NBC delivered that bread to the partnership. Shortly thereafter, the partnership was dissolved, and Stroud refused to pay for the bread delivered at Freeman’s behest. NBC sued the partnership and Stroud for the price of the bread. The trial court found in favor of NBC.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.