National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
555 F.3d 996 (2009)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
When Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, it included confidentiality requirements for consumers’ proprietary information. Under the act, this included information such as quantity, type, destination, and location of phone calls. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) implemented a rule in 1998 that required telecommunications carriers to obtain customers’ consent to disclose the information to certain parties who would use the information for commercial purposes. This was the opt-in method. A challenge was brought against that rule on First Amendment grounds, and in response the FCC implemented a rule that used an opt-out method. This rule required carriers to allow customers only to opt out of certain disclosures. Following this rule, certain data brokers began obtaining significant amounts of customer information from carriers. This led to significant threats to consumers’ privacy. In response to this development, the FCC implemented a third rulemaking, this time returning to an opt-in requirement for disclosure to certain third parties for marketing-communications purposes (opt-in rule). A group of telecommunication providers (plaintiffs) challenged the opt-in rule, claiming that it violated their rights under the First Amendment. The telecommunications providers petitioned for the opt-in rule to be set aside.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Randolph, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.