National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Federal Communications Commission

567 F.3d 659 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Federal Communications Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
567 F.3d 659 (2009)

SC

Facts

Section 628 of the Communications Act of 1934 prohibited cable operators from engaging in unfair methods of competition to prevent other video operators from providing programming to subscribers. Pursuant to this law, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) promulgated a rule that prohibited cable operators from entering exclusive-service arrangements with multi-unit buildings such as apartment complexes. The FCC had previously permitted such agreements but applied its new rule to existing contracts as well. In the order adopting the prohibition, the FCC stated that the harms of such agreements outweighed any benefits in a manner that did not exist in the market when the FCC had decided to permit the agreements previously. The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) (plaintiff) filed a petition for review of the order in federal court. NCTA argued among other things that Congress’s focus with § 628 was exclusion of programming, not exclusion of competing video providers.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tatel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership