National Coalition of Prayer v. Carter

455 F.3d 783 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Coalition of Prayer v. Carter

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
455 F.3d 783 (2006)

Facts

The State of Indiana (Indiana) (defendant) passed the Indiana Telephone Privacy Act (ITPA). The ITPA created a statewide list that Indiana residents could join in order to not be called by telephone solicitors for sales calls. Telephone solicitors included persons doing business in Indiana who called for the purpose of, among other things, obtaining charitable contributions. The ITPA, however, also had certain exemptions. One of those exemptions allowed for calls on behalf of federally tax-exempt charities if the calls were made by volunteers or employees who immediately disclosed their names and contact information. A group of federally tax-exempt charities (plaintiffs) sued Indiana for violating their rights under the First Amendment. Specifically, the charities argued that by limiting their callers to only employees and volunteers, the ITPA impermissibly restricted their ability to use telemarketers to solicit donations from citizens who signed up for the do-not-call list. The parties both moved for summary judgment, and the district court sided with Indiana. The charities appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership