National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Commissioner

914 F.2d 1417 (1990), non-acquiescence, AOD 1991-015 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
914 F.2d 1417 (1990), non-acquiescence, AOD 1991-015 (1991)

SC

Facts

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (plaintiff) was a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization established to oversee regional and national collegiate athletic events in all sports. The NCAA men’s basketball tournament lasted for a few weeks every year. The NCAA produced a program with advertisements for each such tournament. For the 1982 tournament, the NCAA received over $55,000 in revenue for this advertising. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) imposed a tax deficiency on the NCAA, finding that this revenue was unrelated business taxable income. The NCAA appealed the ruling in the United States Tax Court. The tax court upheld the IRS’s determination. The NCAA appealed. The NCAA admitted that the advertising was not substantially related to its exempt purpose but argued that it was not regularly carried on by the NCAA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership