National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Muhammed Lasege and University of Louisville
Supreme Court of Kentucky
53 S.W.3d 77 (2001)
Lasege (plaintiff), a citizen of Nigeria, enrolled at the University of Louisville (U.L.) (plaintiff) with the intention of playing on the men’s basketball team. However, Lasege had previously entered into professional basketball contracts in Russia which compromised his amateur status and thus was declared ineligible to play for U.L. by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (defendant). The University asked the NCAA to reinstate Lasege’s eligibility because he was not aware of NCAA’s regulations prohibiting the receipt of compensation outside of the educational institution. NCAA refused to reinstate Lasege, citing “case precedent” and the extensiveness of Lasege’s compensation related to his Russian contracts. The University appealed the decision to the NCAA’s Division I Subcommittee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement (Subcommittee). The Subcommittee, comprised of representatives of other Division I universities, found that Lasege’s actions exhibited a clear intent to become a professional basketball player and affirmed the decision. Lasege and U.L filed suit in state circuit court seeking a temporary injunction requiring the NCAA to reverse its decision and to immediately reinstate Lasege’s eligibility to play basketball. The trial court granted the injunction and the NCAA appealed to the court of appeals seeking interlocutory relief. After the court granted the injunction, Lasege played basketball for U.L. during the 2000-2001 season. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court and the NCAA appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Keller, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.