National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent

375 U.S. 311 (1964)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent

United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 311 (1964)

Play video

Facts

In 1961, Szukhent (defendant) executed a lease with National Equipment Rental, Ltd. (National) (plaintiff) for the rental of farm equipment. The document was a 1.5 page form lease consisting of 18 numbered paragraphs. The final paragraph in the document assigned Florence Weinberg, an officer at National, as an agent for the purposes of accepting service under the agreement. Szukhent did not know Weinberg, but signed the lease, indicating he agreed with the terms. One year later, National brought suit against Szukhent, alleging that Szukhent had failed to make any payments on the lease. National served Weinberg with the summons and complaint as the agent assigned to Szukhent under the lease, and Weinberg promptly notified Szukhent of the service; National also notified Szukhent that Weinberg had accepted service. Szukhent filed a motion to quash the service, and the district court granted the motion, finding that the agency arrangement between Szukhent and Weinberg was faulty. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)

Dissent (Black, J.)

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership