National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
United States Supreme Court
567 U.S. 519, 132 S. Ct. 2566, 183 L. Ed. 2d 450 (2012)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
In 2010, Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Shortly afterward, multiple parties, including business organizations, individuals, and 26 states, filed suit in district courts across the country to challenge the ACA’s constitutionality. The results were fractured: some courts upheld some or all of the ACA, others declared part or all unconstitutional, some concluded offending provisions could be severed, and others argued that the ACA could not be challenged until someone was forced to pay the penalty. The National Federation of Independent Business, the State of Florida, and others (plaintiffs) sued in Florida federal court Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (defendant). The litigation challenged two key provisions of the legislation: (1) the individual mandate, which required individuals to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty and (2) the Medicaid expansion provision, which conditioned continued receipt of federal Medicaid funds on states expanding their eligibility requirements for the program. The district court held that Congress had exceeded its authority in passing the individual mandate. The court concluded that the individual mandate was not severable and struck down the ACA as a whole. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that the individual mandate was unconstitutional. However, the court of appeals determined that the individual mandate was severable; so, the rest of the ACA remained intact. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the split between the circuits.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.