National Football League v. Governor of Delaware
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
435 F. Supp. 1372 (1977)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
The Delaware Lottery (lottery) ran several contests (collectively, Scoreboard) based on the scores of National Football League (NFL) (plaintiff) games during the 1976 season. The lottery did not use NFL team names in its contest, instead referring to teams by their home cities. The lottery did, however, utilize the NFL’s publicly available schedule and scores after such information was widely disseminated. The NFL sued, among others, the governor of Delaware (governor) (defendant), asserting numerous claims, including claims for misappropriation and unfair competition. The NFL’s claims centered on its alleged reputational harm and loss of goodwill from being associated with gambling, which the NFL sought to support with a consumer survey. The NFL also submitted survey evidence showing that a substantial portion of the relevant public believed that the NFL sponsored or approved Scoreboard. The NFL’s requested relief included an order requiring the lottery to turn over to the NFL the proceeds the lottery received from Scoreboard. In response, the governor argued, among other things, that the lottery did not use commercially valuable NFL information and that there was no evidence that the extensive legal and illegal gambling on NFL games other than Scoreboard had injured the NFL. The court issued its posttrial findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stapleton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.