National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black

53 F.4th 869 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
53 F.4th 869 (2022)

Facts

In 2020, Congress passed the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) for the purpose of establishing uniform rules to govern the horseracing industry at a national level. HISA created the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (the authority) (defendant), a private entity empowered to develop new rules and submit them to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (defendant) for approval. The FTC was required to approve any proposed rules that were consistent with HISA’s purpose. The FTC could suggest—but not order—changes to proposed rules. The National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association and 12 affiliates (collectively, Horsemen) (plaintiffs) brought suit against the authority and the FTC in federal district court, alleging unconstitutionality. The court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that the authority was appropriately subordinate to the FTC. Horsemen appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duncan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership