National Labor Relations Board v. Actors’ Equity Association
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
644 F.2d 939 (1981)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Actors’ Equity Association (Equity) (defendant) was an employee’s association that entered into collective-bargaining agreements on behalf of stage actors with various theater organizations throughout the United States and Canada. Equity imposed a separate dues schedule on its members depending on their citizenship or residency: members who were citizens or permanent residents of the United States or Canada paid 3 percent of their stage income as dues, but dues were capped at $400 per year; nonresident aliens, on the other hand, paid 5 percent of their stage income as dues, with no cap. Yul Brynner was a Swiss citizen and resident of France who was admitted into the United States to perform in a play. If Brynner had been a citizen or permanent resident of the United States or Canada, his dues to Equity for the first year of the play’s run would have been $400; under the separate schedule for nonresident aliens, however, his dues to Equity were $45,000. Brynner filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (plaintiff), alleging that Equity violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) through the use of its discriminatory dues schedule. The administrative-law judge, and later the NLRB, agreed that the separate dues schedule unlawfully discriminated against aliens because it violated the union’s duty to charge uniform dues or to demonstrate a reasonable justification for the nonuniformity. Equity appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.