National Labor Relations Board v. Burns Int'l Security Services

406 U.S. 272 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Labor Relations Board v. Burns Int'l Security Services

United States Supreme Court
406 U.S. 272 (1972)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Lockheed Aircraft Service Co. (Lockheed) used Wackenhut Corp. for plant-protection services. In an election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board (the board), a majority of Wackenhut’s 42 security guards voted for the United Plant Guard Workers of America (the union) (plaintiff) as their exclusive bargaining representative. Wackenhut and the union entered a three-year collective-bargaining agreement. Within a few months of the election, Lockheed decided to switch from Wackenhut to Burns International Security Services, Inc. (Burns) (defendant) for security services. Burns was informed in advance about the recent election, union, and labor contract. Burns chose to retain 27 of the Wackenhut guards and use 15 guards from other Burns locations. Burns provided the Wackenhut guards with membership cards of a rival union, American Federation of Guards (AFG), which represented Burns’s guards in other locations, and told Wackenhut guards that they must become AFG members to work for Burns. Thereafter, Burns recognized AFG as the bargaining representative of Burns’s employees at Lockheed and refused to bargain with the union or recognize the union’s contract with Wackenhut. The union filed unfair-labor-practice charges with the board. The board found that Burns had unlawfully recognized AFG and was required to bargain with the union and honor the union’s contract. Burns appealed, and the matter came before the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership